🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.